Bam, bam, bam-bam, B'bam, bam, bam-bam me too! I've been following this line of thinking (by you and others) and certainly hope that it will prove to be more than the wishful thinking that I so want to embrace.
When it seems clear that in a two-sided election, when these parties are getting almost the same degree in voters' support, the most sensible thing would be for BOTH parties to help run the government. This necessarily would mean that on the relatively few topics where they disagree, nothing should be done. The logic here is that otherwise almost 50 % of the concerned population would be offended if action followed. But instead of a lot of time being wasted on the matters that they necessarily do share for the good of the whole country, there would be no need to compete and the right decision could more easily reached. Particularly on matters of foreign policy this would be beneficial and worthy of use.
Did I miss the part where you said that if Trump wins you'll be evaluating the Dems strategies for claiming the election was stolen from them?
You did not.
Bam, bam, bam-bam, B'bam, bam, bam-bam me too! I've been following this line of thinking (by you and others) and certainly hope that it will prove to be more than the wishful thinking that I so want to embrace.
Thanks for sharing your insights.
As always, just 100% spot-on on so many key points.
Thanks Jonathan. Harris has 2 hurdles. Interested to read your take on #9 and how we prevent/beat likely insurrection efforts.
We'll cross that bridge...
the subheading drew me in
:)
When it seems clear that in a two-sided election, when these parties are getting almost the same degree in voters' support, the most sensible thing would be for BOTH parties to help run the government. This necessarily would mean that on the relatively few topics where they disagree, nothing should be done. The logic here is that otherwise almost 50 % of the concerned population would be offended if action followed. But instead of a lot of time being wasted on the matters that they necessarily do share for the good of the whole country, there would be no need to compete and the right decision could more easily reached. Particularly on matters of foreign policy this would be beneficial and worthy of use.